Law.com has had a makeover. ALM content has now been combined in a one-stop shopping center and is more focused toward specific practice areas rather than particular jurisdictions. She really likes it.
Stanford Law School’s CodeX Project is seeking fellows for the next academic year starting this fall.
CodeX, a joint endeavor between technology-field departments such as engineering and computer science and the law school at The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, is where “researchers and entrepreneurs design technologies for a better legal system. CodeX’s broad mission, under Executive Director Roland Vogl, is to create legal technologies that empower all parties in our legal system and not solely the legal profession.” The advancements are intended to lead us toward the “next frontier” of legal technology.
A review of the projects featured on the Center’s website reveals some interesting Center goals including a visual representation of the players involved in the legal and political system. A tool such as this should be, in my humble opinion, unrelenting in its real world explication of these connections without protective coating intended to gloss over the ragged edges of the system. Ideally, it would serve as a monument of legal realism against the formalistic cant that composes much of the structure of legal information, legal institutions, and legal writing.
I could imagine it being (perhaps in a form not exactly the one envisioned by CodeX) an unintentional tutorial on public choice theory and the workings of mass democracy. The influence of lobbyists, special interest groups, corporations, and voters upon the regulatory, legislative and judicial processes would be revealed. Further, the differing goals, biases, and assumptions of common law courts versus those of administrative agencies and special statutory courts would be detailed and explored. It will be quite fascinating to watch and see what these projects actually lead to.
Read it here.
Writes Kevin O’Keefe: “Law blogs offer unsurpassed insight and commentary. I am not sure how you can exclude law blogs in what’s described as complete and seamless access to personalized legal information.”
If you want the longer version of the decision in Fernandez v. California (2014), click here.
Cases involving violent robbery suspects defending the Fourth Amendment lead to bad law. These bad rulings then apply to the innocent as well who wish to live peaceably without arbitrary police power being asserted against them.