Predictive Litigation Software: O.W. Holmes’ Vindication?

Wasn’t it Oliver Wendell Holmes that stated that a lawyer’s basic responsibility was to predict the outcome of potential litigation? Even in the transactional legal context, a client presumably wants to know what a court would actually rule if a particular dispute were to arise. It now seems that the predictive litigation software being touted as the wave of the future may make these “predictions” into a highly analytical, data-driven (and nearly uniform?) product. Is much of the work lawyers threatened by this? To the extent that it isn’t, are some attorneys going to be transformed into clerks or data analysts?

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s